🔗 Share this article

The action from the DNC to withhold the publication of its own autopsy report on the 2024 election is stunning but entirely predictable. Resistant to unpleasant candor, the DNC operates closer to a publicity machine than a political organization focused on cultivating a volunteer base capable of prevailing at the polls.

An Environment of Conformity

Reluctant to depart from the party establishment's culture demanding unity, the committee has stayed within the Biden-Harris shadow throughout 2025. Releasing the findings might have shown whether the leadership are interested to foster honest conversation regarding the errors that paved the way for Donald Trump to become president again. However, the leadership is moving forward as if there is little to understand from the electoral catastrophe of 2024.

"Here’s our North Star: does this help us win? If not, it’s a distraction from the core mission," a justification that has been offered for withholding the analysis.

Major Failures an Analysis Could Have Explored

An autopsy report with any value would confront key points of failure. These include:

• Voter Disengagement: Failing to retain among millions of voters who voted for the party's candidate in 2020 became a critical factor during the tight 2024 election.
• The Decision to Run: The determined decision by a party leader to run again, coupled with a last-minute step-aside, has been criticized as denying Democratic voters of a competitive nomination process.
• Failing Core Democratic Voters: Amid economic anxiety, the campaign allegedly accommodating elite contributors and not managing to address the impact of big business.
• A Foreign Policy Impact: An unwillingness to adjust a stance concerning the situation in Gaza allegedly caused driving away significant blocs, particularly among youth voters, Arab American communities, and Muslim Americans.
• Losing Youth Backing: Extensive evidence demonstrates a major decrease in votes for the candidate from the youth electorate.

A History Shunning Scrutiny

Choosing secrecy aligns with a recurring tendency of sidestepping uncomfortable facts. This mirrors a situation where nearly all Democratic officeholder in Washington acquiesced to a sitting president's decision for seeking another term right up until a catastrophic public debate performance compelled an exit.

At the same time, a significant majority within the party's base had been continually telling surveyors that they opposed the incumbent to run again.

Campaign Spending Concerns

An honest autopsy could examine matters regarding campaign spending, including the amounts went to high-priced advisors as well as advertising contractors over the course of an electoral effort that managed to spend an enormous amount over a few months.

A Broader Implication

Ultimately, the suppression surrounding this report is symptomatic of an allegiance to the existing power structure who engineered a disastrous electoral effort. The implication to ordinary supporters – including millions of loyal volunteers – is that they do not be trusted to see the lessons the insiders say they discovered based on a report based on conversations with insiders.

A party unable to publicly examine where it went wrong finds it difficult to climb out of the pattern that proved so advantageous to their opponents.